About her subject Attica Bank the president of SYRIZA mentioned in his social media post last night, Stefanos Kasselakis.
Kasselakis spoke of an “agreement that creates a private bank with Greek taxpayers’ money.” And only “circles” to respond from the Finance Ministry, because the minister, otherwise “tough” on the banks, decided to hide.”
Your post
“Well, we have seen most of the media keeping a suspicious silence about the Attica Bank deal. The deal that creates a private bank with Greek taxpayers’ money.
And only “circles” to respond from the Ministry of Finance, because the minister, otherwise “tough” with the banks, decided to hide.
We understand the “anxiety” of the parties involved in signing the agreement first and then informing us.
We are certain that the consultants who have so far received a large sum, up to 21 million euros (see photo), did their best to ensure that the public sector was harmed and the private sector gained.
And cover it with a vocabulary full of terms to disorient the Greek citizen whose money is used to create a private bank.
The FHEF Law provides for two reports from independent financial consultants, “which confirm that the intended participation in the issuance of new shares or other real estate securities contributes to maintaining, protecting or improving the value of the State’s existing participation in the Bank’s capital or prospects for its divestment”.
Is the value of the State’s shares in Attica Bank really maintained, protected or increased? I say it again. The State will sell 33% of Attica Bank, having suffered a loss of 800 million euros. Individuals with only 300 million will hold 51% of the Bank’s shares! A pillar of private banking with State investment.
PS1: Bank of Attica, as I mentioned, is not the only case in which the Greek government has been harmed. More examples will come tomorrow.
PS2: In the end, we walk the path of conflict of interest alone.
Where did the rest of the center-left parties go?’